Defense readiness platform | Public version

NATO staff training for the Ukraine-era battlefield.

C2-SENSE is a simulator for NATO brigade staffs commanding the way Ukrainians do in the war with Russia: degraded COP, ATAK/CoT uncertainty, Fog of War, cyber/EW injects and AAR decision metrics.

Benchmark
3-4 min Ukrainian kill-chain target
Layer
Focused TOC stress-test beside larger CAX systems
Market timing
4.7% Polish defence spend / GDP
Dual-use path
Military staff training and civil protection readiness

01 | Combat-origin product thesis

Command responsibility arrives before doctrine feels real.

C2-SENSE is built around a simple product truth: staff officers must train under degraded information, time pressure and uncertain sensor inputs before those conditions appear in real operations.

Operational insight

From combat-derived TOC know-how to repeatable training.

The product turns frontline command-and-control experience into structured scenarios, injects and measurable after-action review. The focus is not cinematic graphics; it is pressure, uncertainty and decision discipline.

Why this matters

Modern staffs are expected to close the sensor-effecter loop faster than doctrine, software and classroom training usually prepare them to do.

C2-SENSE trains the decisive gap between contested inputs and staff action: partial reports, Fog of War, cyber/EW deception, ATAK/CoT uncertainty and AAR metrics that show where the decision loop breaks.

The simulator is not about graphics. It is about making the staff feel the weight of command while mistakes are still survivable.

This is why the product focuses on degraded information, Fog of War, cyber/EW deception, ATAK/CoT uncertainty and AAR decision metrics.

Instant decisions

Real missions do not wait for perfect information, clean maps or calm staff-room analysis.

Human stakes

The commander carries the consequence: success, failure and lives under his responsibility.

Training gap

Traditional training rarely recreates the pressure of incomplete, contradictory and time-sensitive information.

Simulator answer

C2-SENSE turns combat-derived TOC experience into repeatable, measurable training.

02 | Product

The training layer between contested inputs and staff decisions.

C2-SENSE does not try to replicate the strongest parts of Thales or MASA. It owns a narrower, faster wedge: ATAK/CoT + degraded COP + Fog of War + AAR decision metrics for TOC stress-tests.

TOC decision-loop simulator | training scope
exercise live
Drone / ELINT / HUMINT
Late, partial and noisy reports enter the trainer stream.
ATAK / CoT tracks
Spoofed, stale or conflicting blue-force and target data.
Cyber / EW injects
Degraded COP, false signals and timing pressure.
TOC staff
decision loop
Confirm
Target confidence, source conflict and detection quality.
Deconflict
Friendly-force risk, uncertainty and approval path.
Assess
Decision latency, missed signals and AAR evidence report.
confirm
deconflict
authorise
assess

03 | Capability scope

Focused training layer, not a full CAX replacement.

C2-SENSE starts with the high-value TOC decision-loop layer: degraded COP, ATAK/CoT uncertainty, Fog of War, cyber/EW injects and measurable after-action review.

Core

Fog of War engine

Late, false and contradictory inputs modelled as the core training condition.

Core

Cyber / EW injects

Spoofed tracks, degraded COP and false signals as native scenario events.

Core

AAR metrics

Decision latency, detection quality and deconfliction quality for evidence reports.

Extension

Adversary AI

Doctrine-aware behaviours without pretending to replace a full constructive CAX.

Extension

Sensor modules

Simulated degraded feeds plus ATAK/CoT uncertainty for repeatable training events.

Dual use

Civil-defence pack

Scenario package for crisis cells, infrastructure disruption and multi-agency coordination.

04 | Market

Poland is at the front edge of NATO rearmament.

A Polish dual-use platform with MoD validation and Ukrainian operational input fits the training gap between legacy staff exercises and the tempo of the current battlefield.

Problem

Staff officers train for a war that no longer exists

Legacy environments under-model drones, EW, cyber deception and degraded information. The battlefield compresses the decision loop while training still assumes time and certainty.

Why now

High defence spend and civil-protection modernisation

Poland is the front edge of NATO rearmament and civil-protection modernisation. The market is moving now, not after a long research cycle.

Moat

Ukrainian TOC battle drills plus ATAK/CoT uncertainty

Differentiation is combat-derived battle drills, degraded COP, spoofing and AAR decision metrics.

CriterionThales CAST / STWPWMASA SWORD / TARANC2-SENSE
Core categoryFull tactical staff trainerConstructive CAX / staff simTOC decision-loop trainer
DeploymentHigh CAPEX / permanent centreEnterprise + configurationStandard PCs / on-prem / SaaS
Deployment modelPermanent training centreEnterprise configurationStandard PCs / on-prem / SaaS path
Ukraine TOC workflowsNot public core claimNot public core claimCombat-derived battle drills
EW / ATAK spoofingLimitedLimitedNative scenario type
Primary outputTraining centre exerciseConstructive staff simulationAAR decision metrics and SOP improvement

From product fit to repeatable readiness exercises.

C2-SENSE should enter an organization through a practical training path: understand the operating environment, configure the scenario, run the staff through contested information and convert the AAR into readiness improvements.

PathAudienceExercise focusOutputNext step
Military staff trainingTOC / brigade staffDegraded COP, ATAK/CoT uncertainty, cyber/EW injectsAAR decision metricsScoped staff exercise
Civil-defense readinessCrisis cells and local coordination teamsInfrastructure disruption, misinformation, communications lossSOP gaps and readiness actionsScenario workshop
Integrator pathPrime and defense technology partnersTraining layer beside existing C2, COP or GIS stackIntegration assumptionsTechnical discovery

How C2-SENSE is used

Map contextroles01
Configure scenarioinjects02
Run exercisepressure03
Measure decisionsAAR04
Improve SOPsrepeat05

Product roadmap

StageFocusWhat improvesCustomer value
NowDecision-loop trainerDegraded COP, cyber/EW injects, first AAR metricsStaff training under uncertainty
NextScenario libraryMilitary and civil-defense exercise templatesFaster repeatable readiness events
ScaleIntegration optionsSecure deployment, data formats and partner workflowsProgrammatic readiness reporting

Commercial details, implementation assumptions and procurement strategy are discussed privately after the organization and use case are understood.

06 | Company team

Operational military insight plus secure simulation engineering.

C2-SENSE combines product leadership, Ukrainian operational input, specialist simulation architecture and trusted defense relationships.

KM

President / CTO / Product

Kamil Marczak

Serial founder; NCBR + VC experience; MilTech execution, product ownership and partner development.

SOF

Special operations network

Special Forces Officers

We cooperate with officers from special operations units who support product credibility, military relationships and stakeholder access. Personal details and unit names remain confidential.

UA

Military domain

Staff Officer (Ukraine)

Operational advisor; 3 years brigade-level TOC in combat; ongoing Ukraine know-how transfer.

JK

Lead Architect

Jakub Kurdybelski

Founder and CEO of Adapt-E; specialist in military simulators, ATAK/CoT integration and secure delivery.

07 | FAQ

Public questions for training buyers.

No. C2-SENSE is a complementary TOC decision-loop layer. The wedge is ATAK/CoT uncertainty, degraded COP, Fog of War and AAR decision metrics, not a full CAX centre.
Military training leaders, civil-defense readiness teams, crisis-management organizations and defense technology integrators evaluating decision-loop training.
C2-SENSE sits beside C2, COP, GIS, ATAK/CoT and Palantir-style workflows. It trains teams for the moments when those tools show incomplete, delayed or contested information.
Yes. The same method can model evacuation, infrastructure disruption, misinformation, communications failure and multi-agency crisis coordination.
Commercial details, implementation assumptions, sensitive team details and customer-specific deployment planning are shared only in direct conversations with qualified organizations.

08 | Contact

Request a C2-SENSE demo.

Tell us whether your priority is NATO staff training, civil-defense readiness or integration with an existing C2/COP environment.